Lefora Free Forum
75 views

Well-known taxi driver defends himself in overcharging claim

Page 1
posts 1–4 of 4
superstar - founder
857 posts


A Castlebar taxi driver vehemently defended charges before Castlebar
District Court last week that he had overcharged a fare he took.
Seamus Canning of Garryduff Court, Castlebar was taken to court
by the Commission of Taxi Regulation for three charges arising out
of an incident on January 22 last. Canning was charged with failing
to operate the taxi meter, failing to provide a regulation receipt and
charging a fare contrary to the minimum fare. However Canning,
representing himself, disputed strongly the charges before the court
and Judge Mary Devins adjourned a decision until July 1 to allow her
to consider the matter further.


Three officers of the Commission of Taxi Regulation travelled from Dublin to give
evidence and the Commission was represented by barrister Sineád McDonagh.
Noel McNally, an enforcement officer with the Commission, gave evidence to
the court that he was on ‘covert’ duty in Castlebar on the date in question
and he entered Canning’s taxi at Market (Main) Street and asked to be dropped
at St Patrick’s Avenue, a journey of approximately 600 metres. He told the court
that the meter wasn’t operated and when he reached his destination the charge
was €5, contrary to the minimum fare of €4.10. Also, when he asked for a receipt,
Canning gave him one from the meter which only showed a payment of €4.10.
Under cross-examination from Canning, McNally denied that he had agreed for a
price of €5 for a local call when he got into the taxi.

Tom Barry, also an enforcement officer with the Commission, gave evidence of an
interview he conducted with Canning on February 10 in the presence of fellow
enforcement officers McNally and Joe Kinneen and stated that he had issued a
fixed charge notice to Canning, which Canning refused to pay. Giving evidence
Seamus Canning told the court he had agreed a €5 charge with Noel McNally and
went onto say how he felt ‘slightly intimidated’ by Mr Barry’s questioning in the
interview.

“He (Barry) was badly dressed in a blue hoody and an open shirt and I felt i
ntimidated by his questioning because I felt I had done nothing wrong. I felt
entrapped and didn’t agree to the fixed charge.” Responding to questioning
from Sinead McDonagh, barrister for the Commission, Canning explained that
his practice of charging €5 for a local call covered fares normally in excess of €5
on the meter and rarely, if ever, inside such a charge as, he said, trips like that
from Main Street to St Patrick’s Avenue would be ‘very unusual’. “It is an
understanding I have. I have old ladies who I collect from Dunnes (Stores) who
have the €5 in their hand ready to pay me. If I put on the meter for these ladies
it would be the last time I’d be collecting them. We do things slightly different here.
I think nothing of bringing a bag of coal in for a customer for instance. We don’t
do things down here like they do in Dublin.

“I haven’t come to this court, under oath, to tell a lie between €5 and €4.10. I will
swear that as many times as you want.”After Sineád McDonagh made the point
that any agreement to not use the meter must be in writing, Canning said that
that was news to him and would have strong implications for Castlebar taxi drivers.
After questioning from Judge Mary Devins the court heard that the only sure-fire
way to access information about the requirement for written consent for non
use of the meter was from the Commission’s website but that the Commission
would, from July, take over the running of courses for people who want to obtain
PSV licences, previously that was the role of local authorities, together with Gardaí.
Judge Devins questioned the cost of the three members of the Commission coming
down to Mayo from Dublin on three separate occasions and also questioned how
many similar prosecutions were made. No such figures were available and Judge
Devins deferred her verdict on the matter until the July 1 sitting.



__________________
That's all for now folks
superstar - founder
857 posts

This is a fucking outrage. A regulators enforcer would be sent to Castlebar from Dublin , paid expenses for what a fare that differed from the metered fare by 90 cent. What a waste of time.
Only nine enforcers in the country and this is what they are doing.  In fairness if this was a Garda case the DPP would not waiste tax payers money on 90 cent. In villages and towns customers ask all the time for the meter to be switched off. Some times in Rural areas, taxis travel 10 miles to a fare. The meter just does not serve rural Ireland. Castlebar is no Different to Dungarvan Co Waterford. The meter is never used by the older Taxi drivers. Fact is they are related to most of their customers and its often insulting putting on the meter.

__________________
That's all for now folks
novice - member
20 posts

a lot of our customers do not want the meter on because it is a set fare same price night or day i have lot of customers and they do not want meter on.this all ireland meater shit is one great fuck up angel

__________________
paul donnellan
novice - member
20 posts

the taxi regulatior is only interested in  making money for herself and friends and dont give a fuxx what the customer wants.

__________________
if you find any mis spellings you can keep em
Page 1
posts 1–4 of 4

Reply to: ‘Well-known taxi driver defends himself in overcharging claim’

Membership Required

You must be a member to post in this Forum

join now